From: "Gary Britt" 

The Pentagon is trying to cover for its own ass because the apparently
didn't turn over all the documents and the ones they did turn over may not
have mentioned Atta.  They are motivated to knock this story down so they
don't have to answer questions like:

Why didn't you turn over everything?  Why was abel danger terminated when
it was doing such good work?  Did they not mention Atta on purpose or by
mistake.  Were they trying to duck explaining why they didn't find a way to
get this info to FBI despite Jamie Gorelick, Hillary, Bill or whatever.

The pentagon is circling their own wagons. Just like the 9/11 commission is
doing.  Its getting tougher for them when there are now as of tonight 3 on
the record sources who all say the same thing.  They worked for Abel Danger
and they had Atta on that chart by 2000, and that means 9/11 commission is
full of it when they claim to know where Atta was because they say he
wasn't in USA in 2000 and that he didn't meet Iraqi agents just prior to
9/11 (because he didn't take his non-international cell phone with him ---
what f**king idiots).

Gary


"Gregg N"  wrote in message
news:430aaf0c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Gary Britt wrote:
>
> >Its beginning to look like the 9/11 Commission cover up for the Clinton
> >administration is beginning to fall apart.  Two more on the record
> >non-anonymous sources come forward to say, yep we identified Atta in
2000.
> >Of course if Atta was in USA in 2000 then the commission is wrong about
> >where Atta was and are shown to be unreliable when they say Atta couldn't
> >have been in Cechoslovakia meeting with Iraqi agents because he didn't
have
> >his cell phone (that wouldn't work in Europe) with him at the time.  Who
was
> >the head of staff for the 9/11 commission, Inspector Cluseau??
> >
> >
> >
> That doesn't square with this:
>
> http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050823-121644-6009r.htm
>
> Gregg

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5