| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | `UNABLE TO TRAIN` FAX PROBLE |
Robert, at 06:39 on May 22 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley... RG> Why does USR support class 2.0 when all the fax software vendors RG> and every other modem that I know of supports Class 2 only? BG> Or conversely, why does Rockwell continue to support the interim Class BG> 2 fax when the official ITU standard is Class 2.0 ? RG> Right! I'm in agreement with you here. It seems to me that as RG> so few modem manufacturers have adopted Class 2.0 that it is RG> dead in the water. It would probably be fairer to say that as the vast majority of modems are Rockwell-based, fax Class 2 is also far more prevalent. RG> Class 2 is the defacto standard. Nope, it's not really ANY standard at all. Despite Class 2's almost complete dominance, you stil can't avoid the fact that the official ITU-T standard (or more correctly, recommendation) is Class 2.0, which is pretty cold comfort to all of us Courier owners. Regards, Bill @EOT: --- MsgedSQ/2 3.30* Origin: Logan City, SEQ (3:640/305.9) SEEN-BY: 50/99 620/243 623/630 624/300 625/100 640/201 206 230 305 306 311 SEEN-BY: 640/702 820 821 822 823 829 690/660 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 SEEN-BY: 711/899 932 934 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1 @PATH: 640/305 820 711/409 808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.