Hi Maurice,

On 2021-04-14 21:19:56, you wrote to me:

 WvV>> It doesn't conform to the standard.

 MK> Understood.  Not a big deal as it could easily become redundant and
 MK> unneeded once a real standard is in place that doesn't require ANY kludges.

So you want to replace FTN with something else? Good luck with that...

Don't be that Don Quichot fighting the imaginary windmills... ;-)

 WvV>> It doesn't conform to the standard either...

 MK> I believe you are wrong about that but then again you're spin on it might
 MK> have validity simply because of obsolesence.  So far the only issue I have
 MK> seen is on one particular point software that buggers up the REPLY kludge
 MK> but has no effect on what really matters.

Your sample is way to small to conclude anything...

 MK> Speaking of nonconformity and obsolesence what is the deal with your
 MK> bogus CHRS kludge? -> "CHRS: UTF-8 2"

I am aware of it, but havent' taken the time to fix it. More important things to do...

 MK> It might make someone question your credibilty on mattters of
 MK> conformance to "standards".  Not me of course but then I am not that
 MK> anal when it comes to conformance to phoney-baloney kludges.

Yet you viciously mention it...


Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815