From: John Cuccia 

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:55:08 -0400, "Gary Britt"
 wrote:

>
>"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
>news:jtopg1huh8e00ohipcifbs687r3nicadmi{at}4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:39:43 -0400, "Gary Britt"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> You're too fucking precious for your own good, Gary.   How'd you feel
>> about the car bomb used in OKC?
>
>Well I didn't support it of course, but since they were going to do it and I
>couldn't stop them, I did have a brief thought or two about wishing they had
>parked the truck at a better location like next to the Democratic
>Congressional Caucus, on top of Terry McAuliffe's head, inside the lobby of
>People for the American Way, gee this is really fun thinking of all these
>places.
>
>Just for grins of course.  Not serious at all.
>
>> >
>> >Well, I haven't quite figured out the feminist tie in, but I absolutely
>> >agree that the liberals and ACLU are and were responsible for tying the
>> >hands of law enforcement and creating an atmosphere whereby we were
>unable
>> >to properly detect and prevent 9/11.
>>
>> Except that's not what he meant, he meant that we were being punished
>> by his viciously cruel god for our moral laxity.
>
>I'll admit he was doing a bit of that, and that is a theological point of
>view and he has every right to make theological analyses and preach them to
>his flock.  Its called the 1st Amendment, part II, you know the part the
>left and ACLU hate.

I agree that he has every right to preach whatever bullshit he wants. That
doesn't mean that is not bullshit, however, and that he can't be called on
it.

>I believe he was doing BOTH the punishment thing (which he may well be right
>about) AND the point I clarified for you.  He understands BOTH points of
>view, and discusses them BOTH.

Nah, he's talking about his god raining punishment down on the infidels,
just like the mullahs.  The *only* difference between him (and you and
Robertson) and the mullahs is that they acted on their beliefs.

>> He was, in fact,
>> doing exactly what you've been railing about for years: Blaming
>> America First.
>
>NO!!!  He was blaming the hate america first crowd founding members like the
>ACLU first.  He was right to.

Sounds like he (and you and Robertson) are filled with hate if you think
that we deserved the attacks.

>
>> Of course when a Democrat says that the bombings
>> were partly the result of our misguided foreign policy, you object.
>
>Yes I always object to stupidity and hate masquerading as a political party.

You're hilarious.


>> >I see no problem with that statement
>> >at all.  Its merely the recognition of fact.  I guarantee you that a
>> >majority in every Red State feels exactly the same.  Its you that is the
>odd
>> >man out on this one.

You really believe that  your god was behind the 9/11 attacks?  I suppose
you think the HIV was his punishment for homosexuality, too?

>
>> There you go, Blaming America First.  Hypocrite.
>
>These statements are quite revealing John, even though you didn't intend
>them to be revealing in this way.  Your statements reveal that you think
>America is only those who think like you, and the people in all those red
>states who disagree with the policies of the Anti-Christian Civil Liberties
>Union in Manhattan hate america, because to you America is Manhattan and
>Manhattan is America.

No, I know that people feel the way that you do, I just know that you are
wrong.    And please don't forget that I live in rural south
Louisiana.  My town, Lafayette, was recently named the 9th most
conservative city in the country.  I also know that if you suggested to the
Republican population here that god was punishing us on 9/11 that they'd
laugh in your face.

>> So nice to hear that you agree with the preachers and the mullahs that
>> we got what we deserved in 9/11.
>
>Preachers yes.  Mullahs no.  Still can't tell the difference between us and
>them can you.

There isn't much difference in attitude.  They, however, are willing to act
on their convictions.

>> Once again you side with the preachers and the mullahs who feel we
>> deserver to be punished for what you consider to be our
>> licentiousness.
>
>Once again proving you don't know the difference between us and them.

There isn't nearly as much as you think.  You're both riding your moral
high horses right over the edge.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5