LF> -=> Quoting Alan Presley to Chris Bryan <=-
LF> 
LF>  AP> shows?  At the dead bottom?  TOS did a lot better than that in the 
LF> late
LF>  AP> 60's when sci-fi wasn't nearly as big as it is now.  If Voy and DSN
LF>  AP> weren't "Star Trek" and just a regular show they both would have 
een
LF>  AP> canceled years ago. 
LF> 
LF> Totally disagree....  totally new croud, yes, they weren't born yet, and
LF> I doubt all new Trek fans (under 20) are soap people....  yes, they
LF> have their good moment, and bad ones, but if you stick with them, then
LF> you can be considered a Trekkie.
LF> 
LF>   -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-  -=/\=-
LF>         Luke Fischer    Rom-Tom@Juno.com    SysOp of Dragon's Lair
LF>     Captain of the USS Junart and Admiral of the FSF Simm Organization
LF> 
LF> 
LF> ... Treknology:  Lore was just a Data beta.
LF> --- Blue Wave/TAG v2.20 [NR]
LF> SEEN-BY: 133/2 1023 3001 5012 370/50 396/1 2320/38 3616/20
The treks now are rated worst among shows, yes the pits.  They've been losing
viewers for a while now.  Look at the plots for the shows now, there's more
sex and love affairs than anything.
- Pedit Ver 2.5
--- ProBoard v2.16 [Reg]
---------------