Jim McGinn wrote:-

> > > JMcG:-
> > > They get away with 
> > > it because the medium, paper publishing, is so slow 
> > > and unwieldy.  You can't get away with much on the 
> > > internet.  On the internet when somebody's being 
> > > evasive or misleading they get called on it.  Maybe 
> > > this is what these professionals find so threatening 
> > > about the internet.

> > JE:-
> > I agree. However I will argue that quick rapport
> > discussion cannot replace properly constructed
> > papers. What is needed is some close connection
> > between these complimentary processes. This is why 
> > I argue sbe is well placed to electronically publish
> > sbe peer reviewed papers. It seems like
> > a worthwhile experiment for sbe to attempt.

> JMcG:-
> snip<
> What's really ironic about all of this John is that 
> I don't think you fully comprehend that under the 
> constrainsts of peer-review you won't get away with 
> misusing other people's ideas (Darwin, Popper) the 
> way you've done so casually here.

JE;-
Please provide _evidence_ for the above
misrepresentation _forthwith_, or provide 
an apology. My prediction is Jim will
provide neither proving his argument
to be utterly UNETHICAL


My Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser{at}tpg.com.au
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 11/29/04 6:19:58 AM