In a message dated 07-03-96, Russell Brooks said to Michael Raiteri:

 FF>> And their dealer said, like every other Dynalink, it doesn't
 FF>> recognize Aust dial and busy tones, but it IS a rebadged Sportster.

 MR> RB> They do recognize the dial tones and busy tones on the
 MR> RB> exchanges I have tried them on. But it is a bit flakey. ( not
 MR> RB> perfect EVERY time.

 MR> They do recognize dial tones most of the time but busy tones
 MR> are a real problem. I had to disable it on mine to get Winfax Pro
 MR> to work reliably.
RB>    
RB> My US/Canada Courier does this with faxing (winfax) with this latest
RB>  (29/4 SDL but it works great here with the 0123 SDL, so I believe
RB>  that they didn't do a whole lot of work here to get these Dynalinks
RB>   Austel approved....Its just straight US code.

RB>Bit more lively than the 14.4 ... hey

True but nowhere near as reliable.  My old Zoltrix 14.4/14.4 was 
_unbeatable_ from a fax point of view.  Worked reliably with _all_ fax
programs and never failed to negotiate a fax transfer nor fax receipt. I
only wish the new Dynalink was half as good.

The other thing is that the Dynalink modem is inconsistent with its
connects with an unacceptably high negotiation failure rate.

Has anyone else had this problem and is there a solution.  I have a pretty
standard setup AT&F1&K0L1 - hardware handshaking with no compression and
sound low (still at ear screeching level though :( )

Cheers
Mike
Internet: mraiteri{at}dyson.brisnet.org.au
___
 * MR/2 2.25 NR * I know a good tag line when I steal one.

--- Maximus/2 3.01