"John Edser"  wrote in message
news:...
> Jim McGinn wrote:-
> 
> > > > JMcG:-
> > > > They get away with 
> > > > it because the medium, paper publishing, is so slow 
> > > > and unwieldy.  You can't get away with much on the 
> > > > internet.  On the internet when somebody's being 
> > > > evasive or misleading they get called on it.  Maybe 
> > > > this is what these professionals find so threatening 
> > > > about the internet.
>  
> > > JE:-
> > > I agree. However I will argue that quick rapport
> > > discussion cannot replace properly constructed
> > > papers. What is needed is some close connection
> > > between these complimentary processes. This is why 
> > > I argue sbe is well placed to electronically publish
> > > sbe peer reviewed papers. It seems like
> > > a worthwhile experiment for sbe to attempt.
>  
> > JMcG:-
> > snip<
> > What's really ironic about all of this John is that 
> > I don't think you fully comprehend that under the 
> > constrainsts of peer-review you won't get away with 
> > misusing other people's ideas (Darwin, Popper) the 
> > way you've done so casually here.
> 
> JE;-
> Please provide _evidence_ for the above
> misrepresentation _forthwith_, or provide 
> an apology. My prediction is Jim will
> provide neither proving his argument
> to be utterly UNETHICAL

John, when a peer-review panel asks you to provide 
references when you, invariably, misrepresent other 
people's thinking are you going to accuse them of 
being unethical also?  

Jim
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 11/29/04 9:35:38 PM