In article ,
alister   wrote:
>yes but the card I refereed to not only tested as slow transfer rates the
>makers small print also quoted the same (class2) data rates.
>the class 10 branding on the card was blatantly false.
>
>The obscure/cheap brands are simply not to be trusted

The bigger concern with cheap cards is often whether they even deliver the
advertised capacity.  Consider this:

https://www.amazon.com/-/dp/B08L95DWDY/

$16 for 1 TB?  You can't even get spinning rust that cheap.  If it sounds
too good to be true, that's because it is.

https://www.amazon.com/-/dp/B08HCPTMJG/

$230 for 1 TB is closer to what you'd expect, with 512-GB options ranging
from $65 to $100.  (It's also SanDisk, instead of a company you've never
heard of.)

  _/_
 / v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( https://alfter.us/           Top-posting!
 \_^_/                              >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05