JS>Our District Counsel and I discussed this case and she believes, and I 
JS>agree, that the 11th Circuit Court will overturn the judge's ruling in 
JS>matter. If that happens, the relevancy and materiality defense evaporat
JS>I'm not interested in seeing Clinton embarassed in a civil matter. What
JS>want to see is a lying, perjurious, conniving, disreputable scoundrel 
JS>INDICTED as any other person in this country would be for lying under o
JS>That goes for Hitlary as well. Not to mention the Owl if he lied under 
JS>as well. This crosses party lines for me. If Newt perjured himself, or 
JS>Armey, I fully expect to see them brought before the bar of justice as 
JS>well.
JS>After all, the law is the law.
 
      As you know, I do not accept the infalibility of the law nor do I
advocate blind compliance with unjust laws, a disagreement we have
mutually discussed at great length in the past, but in this case I se
no grey areas and I am in complete agreement with you.  For any system
of justice to function it must be founded in the truth and if any
individual breeches that foundation they ought be held accountable for
their actions. 
  
                                          /\/\ike
--- RBBSMail/386 v0.997
---------------