From: "Patriot Games" 

"Dionisio"  wrote in message
news:460497b4$0$24755$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
> Patriot Games wrote:
>> I think its true.  I think prior to the attack on heterosexual marriage
>> most people were fairly receptive to homo civil unions.
>> Maybe I'm wrong?
> Maybe you should be drug tested.

Not necessary.

> Your theory falls flat when faced with the facts. (Again, available via
> those handy-dandy folks at the boards of election.)
> Your further comments were proof of point.

Covered that already...

>>>So, in other words, you lied. We can't call it anything.
>>>Well, I guess we'll call it what it's supposed to be then: Marriage.
>> Correct.  That's our word.  Come up with your own word.
> A snipped the rest, but had to include this. You freely admit that you
> lied, and then engage in playground antics: We could all see you being the
> selfish child, "It's mine, > MINE!!!"
> The word is what it is. It conveys certain things to all whom choose to be
> branded by it: I.E.: Married. Just as "free" means
"free" to all whom are
> so, so too does "married" mean "married" to all whom are so.
> Your "argument" was fought long, long ago. The
"Separate but Equal" thing
> was defeated most soundly via the demise of the miscegenation laws.
> Now, I do realize that Christians believe in resurrection. However, I
> don't think the corpse of an argument you're championing is worthy of
> that. It is fetid. It is decayed. It smells. It was never worthy of
> respect. It was always about superiority, or the need to feel superior;
> Even if said belief was the grandest of ego trips...
> Just let it rot. Let it stay buried.
> Abuse of a corpse is a crime you know.

Who should be drug tested???

>>>Why should *we* join the ranks of the fork-tongued? It seems there are
>>>enough people in that immoral lifestyle choice already...
>> You invented that.
> Flatterer. I must decline your assertion that I invented the Christian
> Fundamentalist cult. It isn't true, you know. Someone beat me to it by
> several centuries.

So, lemme see if I understand this.  The Fag attack on Marriage is
something you support NOT because you're a Fag but because it actually
attacks Chistianity which you oppose?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag