ML>  
ML>  CL> I did a post on Carol's BBS to see if it would toss properly to
ML>  CL> and show up properly.. I apologize.. 
ML>  
ML> no need to apologize... there has been some crossing of traffic not 
ML> for the 10th_amd echo that has appeared here... we're still trying t
ML> out where the crossover is happening and why...
 
I posted in Carol's Z1 Backbone area...
 
 
ML>  
ML> since you state that you specifically posted on 1:275/100 and the me
ML> appeared in 10th_amd, can you please tell what echo you actually pos
ML> and this message to? if it is not 10th_amd, it may very well lead us
ML> the problem is...
ML>  
ML>  CL> Thanks
ML>  
ML> and thank you! this is one of the few responses that i've had in thi
ML> concerning the problem... carol has responded to netmail about it bu
ML> available traffic and responses have not yet assisted in locating th
ML> with the apparent crossover of the posts that don't appear to be des
ML> the 10th_amd echo... ie: postings between a net coordinator and the 
ML> coordinator concerning regional business...
ML>  
ML> to be honest, i suspect a clash in the hash value generated for the 
ML> area and this one... to explain further and to use my mail tosser as
ML> example, when it is set to automatically create new areas, it does s
ML> calculating a hash value of the echo area's TAG... it is possible th
ML> some mail tosser that is generating the same hash for 10th_amd as it
ML> the real destination echo area tag... since the two are the same, we
ML> with a cross linking of echo areas...
ML>  
ML> hopefully that explains the possible root of the problem that we're 
ML>  
ML> )\/(ark
 
Agreed... I hope we get it sorted out... If I can help let me know..
 
Thanks again,
 
Chad

--- TriToss (tm) Professional 11.0 - #1693