From: "Mark" 

You're right Monte, I misspoke. We very well may be, probably are, in a
cycle of global warming. It's the idea of it being human caused that is
falling by the wayside rapidly.

"Monte Davis"  wrote in message
news:sne7j1dclcbf5b2kgee912r3lkbeg729r0{at}4ax.com...
> "Mark"  wrote:
>
>>> being reduced to a tempest in a teapot, you need a new cause>
>
>> I'm just so tickled pink that I don't have to worry about
>>burning to death in my bed due to global warming, that I just can't stop
>>myself from being elated! 
>
> It seems clear that you believe there's been an important development
> recently w/r/t the prospect of climate change. Care to share it? A
> re-analysis of the Maunder sunspot minimum at Powerline, perhaps? New
> oceanic carbon uptake data from Michael Crichton? Or a more nuanced
> assessment of sulfate aerosol reflectivity by Hannity, O'Reilly,
> Savage & Limbaugh?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5