From: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" 
To: ATM 
Reply-To: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" 


Yes, yet another design:

        http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/jflat2-06x.len

By reducing the requirement for an really flat field, a slightly different
geometry results.  Still has a Strehl ratio of 0.955 (better photopicly and
scotopicly) and the field is still relatively shallow, at 1.5 times the
focal length.

        Rick S.

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP