Ian wrote:

> The politician, known as "unfeasibly stupid head" in some circles, is
> at her mad manhating agenda again.
>
> She's still pushing forward her plans to jail men who want sex.
>
> That's really clever of her, isn't it? Punish men who women don't
> already fancy enough to sleep with for the fun of it.
>
> That's going to make these men treat women well in the future isn't it?
>
>
> Harriet Harmanhater kindly points out here
> (http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=196492005) that...
>
> "Ms Harman admitted that rapes were less likely to result in
> convictions than other serious crimes and said today's conference was
> a vital chance to tackle the problem.
>
> She said: "Although the number of rapes < Ms Har Manhater, remember innocent until proven guilty.>>

Oh yeah! Accuse one of her female clients and
she'll be darned quick to remind us of the
presumption of innocence.

D.

  reported to
> the police has increased dramatically over the years, it is clear that
> very many rape victims < fictitious crime, how do we know there's more of them?>> still don't
> go to the police or, if they do, find themselves unable to go through
> with the court proceedings in which they will usually be the most
> important witness.

I note that if teachers are accused and only
about 5% of cases result in conviction we have
that jerk in the Education department (RUTH
KELLY wanting to stop all these false allegations.

But if menb are accused of rape and only about
5% of case result in conviction something must
be done about it.

Why is it that when it is a teacher accused of
violence the assumption is of innocence; but if
it is a man accused of rape the assumption is of
guilt?

D.


> "Rape is still less likely to be reported, less likely to result in a
> charge, and less likely to be prosecuted than other serious crimes.
> That's why our discussions today are so important.
>
> Sex in marriage isn't rape Harriet. Sex after accepting a meal isn't
> rape Harriet. You can brainwash women into thinking that it is, but it
> just isn't. If you really cared for women, you'd teach them what men
> are, but you don't. Instead to teach them that men's aspirations are
> second to the dogs's.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, you are such a filthy scumbucket.
>
> Sex is physiological for men. You can't punish a lung for seeking out
> air.
>
> For every man that was lucky to a neighbouring country to the woman, at
> the time she said he'd raped her, there are tens of thousands of men
> who were just in a neighbouring postcode.
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/15/05 8:57:20 PM ---