06 May 96 16:09, Peter Collis wrote to Paul Edwards:

 ac>> char *dest, *srce;
 ac>> strcpy(dest, srce);

 ac>> gives a warning but

 ac>> char *dest, *srce;
 ac>> (void) strcpy(dest, srce);

 ac>> does not ... ?

 PE>> I think so, but not recently.  In my experience, lint, microsoft
 PE>> c and cset/2 produce the most ridiculous errors known to man.

 PC> I can't comment on MSC but QC25 compiles the above without warnings
 PC> even with warning levels cranked up to 4 (full)

I should think so, as the two versions of the code are effectively the same
as far as any ANSI/ISO C compiler should be concerned.  I wouldn't
recommend running it though.  :-)

BTW, QuickC 2.5 is essentially the same as MSC 6.0, only MSC supports OS/2
code generation and a few other advanced features.

--- GoldED/W32 3.00.Alpha1 UNREG