From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:433caf34$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:433cac86$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>I just wonder what the story is on the 3 month long confidentiality
>>release
>
> It's spin, plain and simple, by Miller and the Times. It was widely
> reported that she had the same release the Time Mag guy did. It seems, to
> me anyway, that she wanted to play the hand out farther than the Time guy
> was willing to, all for publicity, but it must've got a bit cold and dark
> in there  got her "plight" pushed completely out of the cycle>
>
> Lest I be misunderstood, I have nothing but admiration for reporters that
> stand by their convictions and sources, I simply don't see this instance
> as applicable to those standards.
>
>
>

Given the accuracy of some of her stories I'm not sure the term reporter
applies to her.

I agree that reporters who stand by their convictions and sources should be
lauded. I also think that reporters should publish the names of sources who
they know lied to them ( I'm not saying that Liddy lied in this case or to
this reporter, just in general )

Bob Lewis

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5