Kevin Fisher wrote to All:

KF> Oh well.  What bothers me most is the way the Canadian voter works. 
KF> Reactionary.  Canadians vote against that which pisses them off the most.
KF> No history, no "learning what the issues are", no trying
to see what the
KF> people they are voting for are REALLY about--just reactionary, spur of the
KF> moment anger.

Are you from BC? That's what's been happening in BC for the longest
time. In my younger years I remeber the Social Credit party going down
in ruins to the NDP I think. The Socreds are back now, they're now
know as the BC Liberal party. The BC voters have put up with their crap
for the last two elections. If they don't like a contract they tear it
up and legislate something in it's place. The voting public in BC are
going to get reactionary again I think.

KF> Look at Ontario.  Oh yeah we were angry at Peterson, the bloody Mulroney
KF> lickspittle.  Who's on the opposite side of the fence?  VOTE FOR HIM!  
KF> Enter
KF> Rae.  4 years later:  "Oh that incompetant Rae!  Let's vote for the
KF> opposite...HARRIS!"  And so it goes, over and over again.  We Canadians 
KF> only
KF> vote against the ones pissing us off at that very moment.  And we're about 
KF> to
KF> do it again.

There isn't a lot to vote for it seems. These guys get in power and then
say to themselves "Oh, who do we need to pay?". I think Paul Martin is
still the best leader but the Liberal Party seems to have been corrupted
somewhat. I guess after being in power for so many years they forget.
Jean Chretien is the one who should have been booted and I think this
has a lot to do with what he left behind for the Liberal Party.

 Ttyl :-),
         Al

... When your work speaks for itself, don't interrupt

--- MBSE BBS v0.83.7 (GNU/Linux-x86_64)