On 05-14-09, ROSS SAUER said to ALL:


RS>Is it



LIBERAL TALIBAN ISSUES FATWA AGAINST MISS CALIFORNIA


May 13, 2009


Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the
sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele
Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean,
have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals.


Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad
complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know that
from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.)


But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy with
the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie Prejean.


This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering
their famous "fight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once
again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique
similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc.


First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean
had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's
handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news.


Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This
prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that
Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a
sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are mortal
sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being disqualified from
the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging career.)


Then on Monday some genuine "semi-nude" photos were released.
These were not
what we'd call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar attack, the
left's final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into appearing
naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well.


Christians aren't people who believe they are without sin; they're people who
know they're sinners and are awestruck by God's grace in sending his only Son
to take the punishment they deserve.


This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they're on a
fast track to heaven on the basis of being "basically good"
people -- and also
believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil.


Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records of
Prejean's parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable than
angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce?


Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated
psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of this
debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of "god" and a reverence
for the Bible.


It's not as if Prejean's special talent in the Miss USA contest was to perform
an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, "marriage.")



She didn't even volunteer her "controversial" views on marriage.
Rather, she
was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it -- in an answer wrapped
in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get to the point.


"Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the
other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite
marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that
marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there.

But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and
a woman."


What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust out a
"by golly!" or an "oh my gosh!" Angry gay-marriage
supporters should be happy
they didn't get my version of that answer. It contains some terms you won't
find in your Bible.


Liberals wouldn't attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they've directed
at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It's not just Christianity -- it's women
liberals hate.


From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women
-- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton in
our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims' opinion
of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women's
right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances.


You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal
American male.


I'm not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why
she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice
president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards and
his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people.


But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news
anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political
views of Karl Marx.


From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV
anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters.


It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the
mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and
severely restricts the vision.


The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male's bidding, as the
bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity.


Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby
inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't
care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a
piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.


COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER







---
*Durango b301 #PE*