ml> MikeL> Does NETMAIL really have to be set up in only its' own
 ml> MikeL> GROUP that has only a 'seen by' of the 117/100 HUB  
 ml> MikeL> here?

 ml> i'm not sure i'm understanding your problem, mike... 
 ml> the default general netmail area (that is managed by 
 ml> FE and a dynamic mailer like FD) doesn't have a group 
 ml> assignment...

 ml> can you explain a bit more, please?

 MikeL> I think you may have hit the nail on the head.  As I 
 MikeL> got this whole monstor of 117/100 years ago whne it 
 MikeL> actually was left on the front porch (!) it had a 
 MikeL> "Netmail" enbtry in the FE area lists!  That

that sounds like a secondary netmail area where netmail is imported into
the BBS for users to be able to access it...

 ML> group in which it still 'is' shows that you at 396/345 are shown to

ahhh... you're confusing me (marK) with the other one (marC) ;)

 MikeL> 'see' it. Which I now think I understand is how 
 MikeL> this junk NetMail stuff may be showing up to you 
 MikeL> on the FTP server connection I poll you from.
 MikeL> Yes,the traffic goes into a 'hold' que as is 
 MikeL> 'normal' for your traffic outbound.  But you 
 MikeL> shouldn't show up as 'seen by' for this as an 
 MikeL> 'echo' area at all as far as I can understand 
 MikeL> this.

yeah, i'm not sure without seeing more details... if it is really a NETmail
area, there should be NO seen-by lines... VIA lines, yes, but not
seen-bys...


)\/(ark
member, FastEcho Beta Team