From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
news:k1ppl1d5qit6v4k2psmvdn33qhmd1cn7lt{at}4ax.com...
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 08:55:05 -0400, "Robert Comer"
>  wrote:
>
>>> "I certainly hope that if there is going to be an
indictment that says
>>> something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some
>>> perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime, so they
>>> go to something just to show that their two years of investigation
>>> were not a waste of time and dollars."
>>
>>Err, perjury *is* a crime...
>
> C'mon, get with the program, Bob.
>
> It's only a crime if a Democrat does it.
>
> Here's another reminder:
> http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/239rebkj.asp
> And here is the point: Unless the perjury is clear-cut or the
> obstruction of justice willful and determined, we hope that the
> special prosecutor has the courage to end the inquiry without bringing
> indictments.
>
>

From the same article
But it may not have, too. Press reports suggest that Fitzgerald is unlikely
to bring charges under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982,
the original act whose possible violation he was charged with
investigating. Based on what we know, and absent startling revelations, it
would seem to be a huge prosecutorial overreach to bring charges under the
1917 Espionage Act. So we are presumably left with possible instances of
perjury, obstruction of justice, and false statements to the FBI or the
grand jury.



Remind me what Starr was charged with investigating and when Clinton
committed his perjury.



As far as I'm concerned ANYONE involved in the outing has NO BUSINESS being
in the government. They put their political hardball AHEAD of the interest
of the United States. Even if accidental that is totally unacceptable for
anyone with access to classified information. Anyone who ever worked with
the Brewster Jennings  for is at risk.. Anyone who associated with them is
at risk. Any ongoing intel operations done under that cover is at risk as
are anyone who worked with them, it may or may not be a crime but anyone
involved is too careless or clueless to be in government.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5