From: "Robert Comer" 

Some things just makes sense, what can I say. 

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:435fdec6$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> OK, now I'm confused.
>
> 
>
> Gary
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:435fcc33$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > A pretty good list I would say!!!
>>
>> As do I!
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:435fbeff{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >
>> > A pretty good list I would say!!!
>> >
>> >
>> > http://realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-10_26_05_TB.html
>> >
>> > First, withdraw the unfortunate nomination of Miss Miers. Not only is
>> > there
>> > almost no enthusiasm for her nomination, I have never seen as much
>> > outright
>> > hostility and even anger at an appointment from a president's own
>> > party.
>> > Replace her with a highly qualified, full-blooded, proven conservative
>> > nominee (any number of his appointments to the courts of appeal will
> do).
>> >
>> > Then he can have a principled fight between conservatives and liberals
> (a
>> > debate that should break in his favor at least 60 percent to 40 percent
>> > nationally on the judicial issues), rather than the current idiotically
>> > unuseful fight between blind presidential loyalists and sighted
>> > presidential
>> > loyalists.
>> >
>> > Second, he should delay pushing for guest worker law changes -- and
>> > instead
>> > move full speed ahead with legislation and policies to secure the
> border.
>> > This must be more than symbolic actions and rhetoric. It should include
>> > serious proposals to dramatically render the borders non-porous.
>> >
>> > It should include tens of thousands more border guards, sensor
> technology,
>> > structures and stiff (i.e. criminal prison terms) employer sanctions
>> > against
>> > hiring illegals. When, as now, Democratic governors and Hillary Clinton
>> > have
>> > flanked a Republican president to the right on secure borders, it is
>> > manifest that both principle and political sense is not being exercised
> in
>> > the White House.
>> >
>> > Third, he should rally his base by fighting for serious budget cuts to
>> > offset the necessary increases in defense and disaster relief spending.
>> > While many congressional Republicans will not like this tough love, it
>> > will
>> > be good for them -- and for the national fisc.
>> >
>> > Fourth, political expediency requires him to get on the right side of
> gas
>> > prices. When the eye-popping third quarter oil company profits are
>> > announced -- he must jawbone the oil executives to start re-investing
> that
>> > money. If he doesn't, Republicans in Congress will. Regretfully (though
>> > incorrectly), even a majority of conservatives and Republicans around
> the
>> > country use the word price-gouging to describe current conditions.
>> >
>> > If the president were to make these four bold corrections, virtually
>> > his
>> > entire base would snap back to his side to do noble and fierce battle
>> > on
>> > his
>> > behalf. He would not only be substantially true to his party's
> principles,
>> > but he would move from about 40 percent to about 48 percent in the
>> > polls --
>> > a critical increase.
>> >
>> > Oh, and one other thing. As I write this column, Washington is waiting
> "in
>> > hope or despair, depending on party affiliation -- for the special
>> > prosecutor to announce his indictment decisions. I truly hope that none
> of
>> > the president's aides have done anything to deserve criminal
>> > indictment.
>> > Some of them are my friends.
>> >
>> > But if any of their actions warrant criminal conviction, the president
> and
>> > his allies would be grievously ill-advised to minimize such criminal
>> > conduct
>> > or disparage the prosecutor. Perjury, if that is the charge, is a very
>> > serious felony. All the more so when committed by a person in high
> office.
>> >
>> > Neither the president nor conservatives generally should raise the
> Clinton
>> > defense. Any Republican who measures his integrity by the standards of
>> > Bill
>> > Clinton (and his disreputable apologists) is unfit for public office.
>> >
>> > If the worst happens, the president should make a clean break with such
>> > conduct -- and such people. He has three years left in his office. He
> owes
>> > it both to himself and to the country to take such actions as to make
>> > those
>> > years highly ethical and productive. The world is too dangerous for
>> > anything
>> > less.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5