From: "Mark" 


"Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
news:435da2b5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:435da09a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
>> news:435d9f83{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:435d9e0a{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Robert G Lewis" 
wrote: ... If you care to
>>>> follow up Google on
>>>>> Wilson Senate Report will provide several articles on
that .
>>>>
>>>> Nah, not really Bob. We've already done this argument back
then anyway.
>>>> I'm content to wait for Fitzgerald to act, or not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well on THAT we can agree.Hopefully the attack dogs will keep quiet and
>>> let things play out ( I know I Know I'm OVERLY optimistic )
>>
>> If he indicts, the Reps will rake him over the coals, if he doesn't the
>> Dems will. He's in a no-win situation > about what people think of him  -- I think he doesn't>
>>
>
> I agree somewhat. I think there are some members of BOTH parties who will
> give what he says an honest reading. He seems to be a good hard nosed
> professional prosecutor. I wish more were like what I've read about him
> .

I actually think that *most* will. The "rakers over the coal"
crowd will be populated by the usual suspects in both elected office and
the MSM.

The Sunday morning questions will be framed thusly, if there's no
indictment: "do you think it's fair that he let them off the
hook?"  (and all the Dems will say no and the Reps will say yes) and
if there is an indictment, the question will be phrased: "do you think
they got what they deserved?" (the Reps will say no and the Dems will
say yes, but not enough)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5