From: "Robert Comer" 

> No, that's not quite what he said.

He sure did.

>He said he was dissatisfied with  Saddam's account of the disposition of
>the WMDs.

Yep, he said that too, and with good reason.

>He was also annoyed that  the Iraqis were removing boxes of document out
>the back doors of buildings  while Blix & Co. were delayed at front
>doors -- data that could have been  anything from the burial or overseas
>locations of WMDs to technical data  useful in reconstituting WMD programs.

I don't remember this one -- so where are these documents?  (You can't
reconstruct the weapons of you destroyed the plans)

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
news:op.sy6xaqfkeipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:10:41 -0400, Robert Comer 
> wrote:
>
>>> And there were intelligent people who said that there *were*.  Even the
>>> Patron Saint of Inspections had declared his dissatisfaction with
>>> Saddam's
>>> report on the topic.  We also knew he HAD them at some point because
>>> he'd
>>> used them on his own people.
>>
>> But he also said that he didn't believe Saddam had any WMD's and he
>> wanted
>> to take the time to prove that.
>>
>
> No, that's not quite what he said.  He said he was dissatisfied with
> Saddam's account of the disposition of the WMDs.  He was also annoyed that
> the Iraqis were removing boxes of document out the back doors of buildings
> while Blix & Co. were delayed at front doors -- data that could have been
> anything from the burial or overseas locations of WMDs to technical data
> useful in reconstituting WMD programs.
>
> --
> Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5