From: "Robert Comer" 

> Then your memory is convenient and what are you attempting to say in
> parentheses?

No, I said I didn't remember that situation and it's because I never heard
it before.  The sentence in parens was a comment about if it did happen,
they either should have been found or they were destroyed, therefore no
threat to us.

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
news:op.sy77l7fueipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:33:11 -0400, Robert Comer 
> wrote:
>
>>> No, that's not quite what he said.
>>
>> He sure did.
>>
>>> He said he was dissatisfied with  Saddam's account of the disposition of
>>> the WMDs.
>>
>> Yep, he said that too, and with good reason.
>>
>>> He was also annoyed that  the Iraqis were removing boxes of document out
>>> the back doors of buildings  while Blix & Co. were delayed at front
>>> doors -- data that could have been  anything from the burial or overseas
>>> locations of WMDs to technical data  useful in reconstituting WMD
>>> programs.
>>
>> I don't remember this one -- so where are these documents?  (You can't
>> reconstruct the weapons of you destroyed the plans)
>>
>
> Then your memory is convenient and what are you attempting to say in
> parentheses?
>
> --
> Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5