From: "Mark" 


"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:435995bc{at}w3.nls.net...
> Bush knew a lot of this to begin with, hence the lying part...  I know you
> don't agree, but you know I don't agree with you about it either.

That's more pure conjecture, and you know it.

> We really ought to just can discussions like this as none of us are going
> to change anyone else's mind.

Can't argue with that, I could be lying, but I think I mostly enter these
threads after a new post is entered falsely claiming (yet again, with the
same lack of evidence) that Bush is lying -- when those false claims stop
coming, my refutation won't be necessary.

>You choose to trust Bush, fine, that's okay, but at least understand why we
>might not.

Trusting in his doctrine and his implementation of same is one thing,
certainly I can understand a pacifist not wanting to go along with that --
but to then take it out to the illogical conclusion along the lines of:
"well, he's a war mongering chimp and he lies besides" in effort
to refute that doctrine is, quite simply nonsensical.

If you think the world would be better off with Saddam in power, that we
should just roll over and not "stir things up" in the world, just
say so, don't try to undermine our foreign policy by interjecting the
"Bush lied" pomposity at every turn (and yes, Bob, I know you're
not a primary offender in that regard)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5