On Sun 30 Jun at 16:55 Ian Smith (3:626/660{at}fidonet) wrote to Arthur Marsh:

 IS> Also, have you found anything yet re Craig Ford's contention 
 IS> that 'V.34 requires V.8, which specifies that V.32bis must 
 IS> be available as fallback' question (while David's of a mind 
 IS> to be clarifying FTN modem flags)?

Haven't printed out ITU-T Recommendation V.34 yet, but I have yet to hear
of a V.34 modem that didn't support V.32bis, V.32 and V.22bis.

--- msgedsq 2.1