From: "Robert G Lewis" 

Ah Gary's almost back to normal .

I totally disagree about Plame. Not only is she no longer useful as an
operative but the Company she worked for is also. ANYONE who had cover
there is now exposed  and at risk, as is anyone who met with them. Whether
a crime was committed or not I don't care , those involved have no business
in the Government. If they did it through carelessness or intentionally
they exposed US operatives to risk and harmed our intel operations.


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:435d6fe4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> They sought to rescind it when a political hack abusing his office and
> committing what are unethical and illegal (for federal prosecutors) acts
> was
> prepared to violate the law yet again.
>
> Indicted for crimes that didn't exist.  Grand Jury shopping when various
> grand juries wouldn't indict for a crime that didn't exist at the time and
> wasn't committed even if it were a crime at the time.  Then grand jury
> shopping yet again for more indictments for crimes that don't exist.
>
> A grand jury foreman of the first grand jury that returned an indictment
> saying in an on the record interview with a reporter/radio host that "He
> didn't need to see any evidence in the grand jury room to know Delay was
> guilty.  That he knew Delay was guilty BEFORE he joined the grand jury
> because he didn't like a campaign commercial in 2000 that he associated
> with
> Delay".
>
> There should be public outrage over these illegal actions by Ronnie Earle,
> but the MSM isn't interested in ginning up outrage over something a hell
> of
> a lot more serious than a house republican conference rule or the entire
> Plamegate affair.
>
> Gary
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5