From: "Robert Comer" 

> No, I just want to see some perspective and evenhandedness.

That sounds great to me too.  I just don't like being played a fool, and
one tends to hold a grudge in cases like that.

>I don't think  Bush lied on this point and I don't think Clinton did
>either.

Unfortunately I think Bush was looking for any shred of information that
supported his cause, in spite of it being shaky and denied by most that
should know.  Why he did that I cannot even make a guess. Nothing logically
supports it.

>You don't  seriously think Bush would have loved the photo op next to the
>recovered  WMDs?

Of course he would, it would vindicate his decision.

>You don't think there was a serious "Oh, Shit!" moment when it  became
>clear we weren't going to find them?

From what he has said since then, no.

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Wiltshire"  wrote in message
news:op.szdks9cieipai0{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:29:47 -0400, Robert Comer
>  wrote:
>
>>> If Bush "lied" so did Clinton.
>>
>> If Clinton "lied" so did Bush. 
>>
>> Frankly it doesn't bother me a bit to say Clinton lied, we know he lied
>> about other "things".  What bothers me is that some
think it's okay for
>> Bush
>> to lie if Clinton did it first.
>>
>
> No, I just want to see some perspective and evenhandedness.  I don't think
> Bush lied on this point and I don't think Clinton did either.  You don't
> seriously think Bush would have loved the photo op next to the recovered
> WMDs?  You don't think there was a serious "Oh, Shit!" moment when it
> became clear we weren't going to find them?
>
> --
> Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5