From: "Mark" 


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:4360438a{at}w3.nls.net...
> I'm not saying that following the GC will reduce acts of terrorists
> against our POWs and I won't accept a doctrine that says as long as they
> do inhumane actions it's OK for us to do it also.

I never said it was OK. My point all along was feel free to argue
vehemently for GC coverage for those that don't qualify for it all you
want, but don't use the "if we don't our own POWs will suffer
more" argument when you do so, because that argument is simply untrue.


--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5