From: "Gary Wiltshire" 

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:07:10 -0400, Monte Davis
 wrote:

> "Gary Wiltshire"  wrote:
>
>> Working prototypes for the production of more in the future.
>
> I have no doubt. And of about as much value and significance as his
> scattered, corroded gas shells.
>
> Try to understand, Gary. I don't deny, I have never denied, no one
> with half a brain denies, that Saddam Hussein had had and used
> chemical weapons, or that he would have liked all the WMDs he could
> get. So would thirty or sixty other despots around the world. But that
> "Saddam Hussein has nasty ambitions" (which was true) was *not* the
> salient argument advanced for the invasion.
>
>
>
>
>
I don't give a damn.  I know why *I'm* happy the man with nasty ambitions
is out.  As to the "argument advanced" Clinton made all the same
claims about Hussein and WMDs during HIS administration.  That is a FACT
readily verifiable.  If Bush "lied" so did Clinton.


--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5