From: "Robert Comer" 

> Actually, the existing resolutions provided more than sufficient
> justification.

No, they don't, not even close.

>But even had they not, perhaps you should ask yourself why the UN may not
>have authorized action? yourself if you're comfortable with manipulation of a world body?>

Oh, let me think, of yeah, Iraq wasn't a threat and they knew it?

 members and ask yourself if you're comfortable with manipulation of a
> world body?>

It's definitely not perfect, but it's a start.

- Bob Comer

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:43643f3a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:43643e40$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> As I said to Bob, you understand my position. Just in case you forgot:
>>> his defiance of multiple UN resolutions was reason enough to take him
>>> out.
>>
>> That would only be true if the U.N. authorized the action, they didn't.
>
> Actually, the existing resolutions provided more than sufficient
> justification. But even had they not, perhaps you should ask yourself why
> the UN may not have authorized action?  members and ask yourself if you're comfortable with manipulation of a
> world body?>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5