Hi Dave, as you were just saying about Re: Home Security....
DS>  RW> safer?  The British example is just the 'final
DS>  RW> solution' to the safety question.  If people can't have
DS>  RW> handguns (or other types of guns) then they can't hurt
DS>  RW> anyone therefore we are all safe.
DS> 
DS> The ban in Britain was on handguns only. 
DS> 
DS>  RW> That is until the criminals realize that they have a
DS>  RW> wide open field (e.g. Washington, DC).
DS> 
DS> As if the prohibition in DC is enforceable with free and open
DS> borders.
Who cares?  If guns are the problem, why don't the crime results in
Virginia, Delaware, Connecticut, etc.. match or exceed those of DC?  
Answer has to be something other than guns. Try societal problems such
as education and economics.
 
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X Nobody's got the right to see your hand until they bought it!
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------