From: "Gary Britt" 

Well put Mark.  Are these your own?  Gibson from Fox News has a book out
now called the "War on Christmas (Christians)"

Gary

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:436ad262{at}w3.nls.net...
> Hmm, I'm thinking more along the lines of (and this has nothing to do with
> the Wilson's in particular):
>
> *Santa Claus is a jolly guy that brings you presents, don't worry about
> Jesus, you're just a kid, you can decide later what you believe and if
> you're lucky you can express those feelings without the f'ing ACLU taking
> you to court.
>
> *Halloween is a fun time where you get lots of candy and maybe get scared
of
> someone in a costume, you don't need to worry about Devil Worshipers right
> now, in fact you don't ever have to worry about them, as they're entitled
to
> worship as they see fit; the ACLU will see to it, for them, but they'll
> fight your rights to their last dollar.
>
> *Easter is for egg hunts and it's okay if they're dyed pink and blue, and
> don't worry about rising from the dead, you're a kid. Later you can decide
> what you believe, but remember, you must not express that feeling, or the
> ACLU will sue you.
>
> *July 4th is for fireworks and flags and appreciation of your country, but
> just enjoy the fireworks and don't worry about the country until you're
> older, be a kid and enjoy. Later you can decide if the country is really
all
> that, or if it should abdicate its future to the f'ing UN.
>
> *Thanksgiving is for family time in appreciation of the bounty provided by
> our country that we fought long and hard for, enjoy your turkey, or just
eat
> the pumpkin pie. Later you can decide whether you accept the
indoctrination
> attempts to show how bad your ancestors were for fighting the Indians.
>
> *Columbus Day is for building your imagination about explorers on small
> boats sailing into the unknown, later you can decide if exploration is
> really exploitation, but if you listen to the morons you'll be living in
the
> past as they do -- don't make that mistake.
>
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:436acb0d{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Ah - the neocon re-education camps?  Where the key concepts of neocon
life
> > are taught
> >
> > *Science is a evil
> > *Nonconformity is evil
> > *Torture is good for the soul
> > *God loves us all( except for unbelievers who are evil )
> > *Evil should be exterminated
> > *Exterminate Exterminate Exterminate
> >
> > Or is that the DALEK re-education camp? The two are so similar I
sometimes
> > get them confused
> >
> >
> > "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> > news:436ab9d9{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>I forgot to add that after Wilson and his bitch wife are imprisoned that
> >> their kids should be taken by the state and placed in foster care for
> >> re-education.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> >> news:436ab87d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >>> So Joe Wilson lying about his mission, who sent him, what he found
out,
> >> all
> >>> for 15 minutes of infamy isn't media manipulation, but
attempting to
get
> >> the
> >>> truth out that's manipulation to you.   Riiigggghhhhttttt.
> >>>
> >>> Joe Wilson is a liar and self aggrandizing idiot who was part of a
rogue
> >> CIA
> >>> plot to perpetrate a bloodless coup, he should be imprisoned along
with
> >> his
> >>> traitorous wife and a few of her superiors.
> >>>
> >>> Millions of people are writing their senators demanding a
> >>> senatorial/criminal investigation into Wilson, Plame, and
parts of the
> >> CIA.
> >>> They need to be hauled in, put under oath, and scrutinized against
every
> >>> statement they have ever made in and outside of the CIA, under oath
> >>> statements of all they claimed to speak to for the past 2 years
related
> >>> to
> >>> their possible crimes.  I just hope their memories are perfect, and
they
> >>> don't forget something and get indicted.
> >>>
> >>> Gary
> >>>
> >>> "John Cuccia"  wrote
in message
> >>> news:1bblm19necc3egimr5smkag2jokakbj0e4{at}4ax.com...
> >>> > It isn't irony, it is a concerted effort on the part
of the Bush
> >>> > administration to manipulate and use the same media
the excoriate as
> >>> > "liberal" on a daily basis.
> >>> >
> >>> > Some time back there was a discussion in which I
claimed (and still
> >>> > do) that today's Republican Party controlled the
political debate in
> >>> > this country.  This type of media manipulation is
exactly what I
> >>> > meant.   In this case the Bush Administration used
the media (in
> >>> > concert with perjury and obstruction of justice) to
maintain their
> >>> > electoral popularity until after the Boy Wonder was
re-elected.
> >>> >
> >>> > Since then the veil has been lifted , which is why
Bush has lost the
> >>> > support of moderates, independents,and crossover
Democrats, and is
> >>> > left with the 30-something percent of the population that are
> >>> > yellow-dog-type Republicans.
> >>> >
> >>> > Bush's re-election was the direct result of criminal actions
> >>> > perpetrated by his lieutenants.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:19:56 -0500, Robert Comer
> >>> >  wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > >The irony is deafening. 
> >>> > >
> >>> > >- Bob Comer
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >Rich Gauszka wrote:
> >>> > >> So the MSM did rig the elction?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>>
> >>
http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-scheer1nov01,1,3380519.column?ctra
ck=1&cset=true
> >>> > >> What Judy forgot: Your right to know
> >>> > >> THE MOST intriguing revelation of Special
Prosecutor Patrick J.
> >>> Fitzgerald's
> >>> > >> news conference last week was his assertion
that he would have
> >>> presented his
> >>> > >> indictment of I. Lewis "Scooter"
Libby a year ago if not for the
> >>> > >> intransigence of reporters who refused to
testify before the
grand
> >>> jury. He
> >>> > >> said that without that delay, "we
would have been here in October
> >> 2004
> >>> > >> instead of October 2005."
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Had that been the case, John Kerry probably
would be president of
> >>> > >> the
> >>> United
> >>> > >> States today.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> .....
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> INSTEAD OF confronting Libby for trying to
mislead reporters,
> >>> > >> Miller
> >>> did
> >>> > >> nothing to expose his efforts to smear a
former ambassador for
> >> raising
> >>> such
> >>> > >> questions. At the very least, she should
have written a story
> >>> > >> stating
> >>> that a
> >>> > >> White House official was planting
information to disparage a
critic
> >> of
> >>> its
> >>> > >> war policy. Miller couldn't do that because
she had acceded to
> >> Libby's
> >>> > >> demand that his White House connection be
concealed in any
articles
> >> she
> >>> > >> wrote, by identifying him as a "former
[Capitol] Hill staffer."
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> This case was never about protecting
government sources who risk
> >> their
> >>> > >> careers by telling the truth, but rather
about punishing those
like
> >>> Wilson
> >>> > >> who do. That Miller cared far more about
protecting someone who
> >> abused
> >>> his
> >>> > >> power as the vice president's chief of
staff than about
protecting
> >> the
> >>> right
> >>> > >> of Wilson to speak truth to power says
volumes about her
> >>> > >> priorities.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> That the New York Times again editorialized
last week in defense
of
> >> its
> >>> > >> knee-jerk support of Miller, even after
knowing she deceived her
> >>> editors, is
> >>> > >> a startling indication that even some of
our most respected media
> >> leade
> >>> rs
> >>> > >> still are missing the point.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> The 1st Amendment protection is not a
license for mischief on the
> >> part
> >>> of
> >>> > >> journalists eager to do the government's
bidding. To the
contrary,
> >>> > >> it
> >>> was
> >>> > >> conceived by the founders to prevent
government from subverting
the
> >>> free
> >>> > >> press in an effort to misinform the public.
Unfortunately, that
is
> >>> precisely
> >>> > >> what occurred here.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5