From: Monte Davis 

"Mark"  wrote:

>No, that's not it Monte. Just not real interested in replaying the same
>argument 2 years later.

Also, obviously, not interested in the difference between an open-ended
question: "Who do you think might be behind the September 11 terrorist
attacks?" (3% name Iraq or Hussein)

And a leading question: "How likely is it that Saddam Hussein was
personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks?" (34%
"very," 44% "somewhat")

Any pollster on earth, right or left, will tell you that a 10x or 20x
difference in the response to those two types of question is by no means
unusual. (Especially with Laurie Mylroie and James Woolsey all over the
airwaves, starting the evening of 9/11, peddling their Iraq/WTC '93
connection)

If you're not running for President, consider a position on the VP's staff.
They may not need you as a consultant, but they could hang you on the wall
as proof of a job well done.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5