Hi Charles, as you were just saying about Re: Home Security....
CH> RT>I probably misstated what I meant.  What I was trying to say is that,
CH>   >IMHO, law enforcement is not above the law.  I feel that most of the
CH>   >abuses are on the federal level, but the thought applies all the way
CH>   >down the line.  If a drug bust is attempted and the wrong house is
CH>   >busted and someone gets killed, I damn well don't think that law
CH>   >enforcement should have the ability to just walk away from it, saying
CH>   >excuse me, we're sorry.
CH> 
CH> RT>BTW, if I am involved in a shootout, I am not there for my personal
CH>   >interests, either.  :^)
CH> 
CH> If there is gross negligence or bad faith, of course you are
CH> correct. However sometimes S___ happens. 
True,  I am just saying that if that S___ happens, normally, my *only*
personal interest is getting my hat the hell out of there.  If there
were an innocent third party who was being threatened, that could add
to my list of personal interests.  :^)
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X Sex on television can't hurt you--unless you fall off.
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------