From: "Robert Comer" 

> Sorry, all I see is speculation, based on the implications of quantum
> mechanics.

That's all that I see too, but some of them don't address it as such.
(agreed it's just a wording thing...)

--
Bob Comer


"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
news:vphdn19bi36ogdhinhlj6lo9jqgcu7tkl6{at}4ax.com...
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:53:55 -0500, Robert Comer
>  wrote:
>
>> > Oh, you don't accept that there was a big bang?
>>
>>I'm undecided, the universe exhibits some behaviors that would indicate
>>such
>>an event, but it doesn't explain it all. My biggest problem with the
>>theory
>>is what came before that.
>
> As far as I know (maybe not very far, I admin) the theory doesn't
> address what came before that.
>>
>> > I haven't heard anyone discuss "before that" who
claimed not to be
>> > speculating.
>>
>>http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/mark_vuletic/vacuum.html has a few
>>quotes...
>
> Sorry, all I see is speculation, based on the implications of quantum
> mechanics.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5