From: "Robert Comer" 

I thought that was  funny too. 

--
Bob Comer


"Paul Ranson"  wrote in message
news:437a3901$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>I like the cross between radish and cabbage ending up with the root of the
>cabbage and the top of the radish.
>
> Paul
>
> "Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
> news:MPG.1de3c80ff431059498972a{at}news.barkto.com...
>> In article , paul{at}barkto.com says...
>>> http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html discusses observed
>>> speciation, starting with a discussion of what 'species' means.
>>>
>>> Contrast the comprehensiveness with
>>> http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/deception.html#TalkOrigins
>>
>> I found this telling from the last site reference:
>>
>> "If you look at the speciation events that are listed as evidence of
>> evolution, most of them will fall into the polyploidy plant category."
>>
>> It's true that early 20th century experiments and observations were most
>> likely polyploidism or hybridization. But there are examples even within
>> those experiments that the author's "duplicate" process
doesn't wash.
>> Examples include different chromosome pairs, reproduction across genus,
>> and creation of fertile growth from infertile products.
>>
>> And the site ignores totally observed speciation outside polyploidism
>> ("most of them" implies this actually).
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5