Hello Bj”rn,

On Tuesday March 26 2019 17:50, you wrote to you:

 BF>>>> How times fly. It's almost five years now. To be exact, since:

 BF>>>> 2009-02-11 05:34:22 UTC

 BF>    One would expect that I from the lines above (three years vs. five
 BF> years) should be able to solve this important matter about who was the
 BF> first to create an IPv6 tunnel, but I have to give up.

I can't find it either. Considering that my memory is notoriously unreliable, I 
will happily give you the benefit of the doubt when your memory says, you beat 
me by a couple of days.

 BF>    I just hate it when I have to give up...  8-)

I have learned to live with it a couple of decades ago...

Other than that...

Here we have a saying: "onderzoek alles en behoud het goede". Explore 
everything and keep the good things.

You don't have native IPv6. You have IPv6 via a 6in4 tunnel. So you have de 
facto Dual Stack capability. But that is not the only way that leads to Rome. 
Accepting DS-Lite or even an IPv6 only connecting from your ISP and using a 
4in6 tunnel to have the best of both worlds is another way.

IIRC Tony Langdon is using 4in6 tunnels. When IPv6 becomes the dominanty 
protocl - and we may live to see that - using a 4in6 tunnel may be better than 
the other way around.

Plus that there is also feste-ip.net for those that only need a few ports 
incomng.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303