From: "Robert Comer" 

> Sheesh, this is all just the same old, same old, you'll never change your
> mind, nor will I.

Without evidence, there's no way to change my mind.

>Bush did NOT lie. 

Sorry, he most certainly did.

"Saddam Hussein is no longer a threat to the United States because we
removed him, but he was a threat...He was a threat. He's not a threat
now." . President Bush, 7/2/03
"We gave our word that the threat from Iraq would be ended." .
President Bush 4/24/03

"We ended the threat from Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass
destruction." . President Bush, 7/17/03

"The dictator of Iraq and his weapons of mass destruction are a threat
to the security of free nations."
. President Bush, 3/16/03

"The Iraqi regime is a threat to any American. ... Iraq is a threat, a
real threat."
. President Bush, 1/3/03

"Saddam Hussein is a threat to America." . President Bush, 11/3/02

"There is real threat, in my judgment, a real and dangerous threat to
American in Iraq in the form of Saddam Hussein." . President Bush,
10/28/02

"There are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands
alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place.
Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical
weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists." . President
Bush, 10/7/02

"The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique urgency." . President Bush, 10/2/02

"There's a grave threat in Iraq. There just is." . President Bush, 10/2/02

"This man poses a much graver threat than anybody could have possibly
imagined."
. President Bush, 9/26/02

- Bob Comer







"Mark"  wrote in message
news:437ce305{at}w3.nls.net...
> Sheesh, this is all just the same old, same old, you'll never change your
> mind, nor will I. *What's* new is the Dems throwing out a bunch of
> baseless accusations that BushLied(tm). Bush did NOT lie.  So
> they, although being effective in hurting Bush's poll ratings in the short
> term, they're are actually coming off like the buffoons they are with
> their own lie in this regard for the long term  harmful to our country and our troops and I'm damn sick of listening to
> the little weasels>
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:437ce159{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Bush never said imminent.
>>
>> So, it was implied.
>>
>>> Iraq was a threat.  With or without WMD on the ground and it needed to
>>> be
>>> taken out as part of the GWOT.
>>
>> Now they are, but they weren't before we invaded and there's no way you
>> can convince me of otherwise, he had *no* means to be a threat.  They
>> weren't even connected with terrorism before that...
>>
>>> Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein to
>>> have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>>
>> Desire means squat, ability is the only thing that counts.
>>
>>> We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:437cde0a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>> "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>>> news:437cda68{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> > When you or the democrats get some then, let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Plenty has been said, I don't need to reiterate it. 
(Something about
>>>> Iraq
>>>> being an imminent threat....)
>>>
>>> Bush never said imminent.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, that Iraq was a threat
>>>
>>> Iraq was a threat.  With or without WMD on the ground and it needed to
>>> be
>>> taken out as part of the GWOT.
>>>
>>>>, or that their intelligence was wrong about it
>>>
>>> Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein to
>>> have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>>>
>>>> and we shouldn't have invaded.
>>>
>>> We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5