From: "Robert Comer" 

> OK, you're convinced of your error.

Not my error!

> This is factually incorrect as to both *threat* and *connections
> terrorism*.
> He had connections to Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorists.

Sorry no, those didn't pan out.

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:437ce2f9{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:437ce159{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > Bush never said imminent.
>>
>>
>> Now they are, but they weren't before we invaded and there's no way you
> can
>> convince me of otherwise,
>
> OK, you're convinced of your error.
>
>> he had *no* means to be a threat.  They weren't
>> even connected with terrorism before that...
>
> This is factually incorrect as to both *threat* and *connections
> terrorism*.
> He had connections to Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorists.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>> > Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein
>> > to
>> > have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>>
>> Desire means squat, ability is the only thing that counts.
>>
>> > We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:437cde0a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >
>> > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>> > news:437cda68{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> > When you or the democrats get some then, let me know.
>> >>
>> >> Plenty has been said, I don't need to reiterate it. 
(Something about
>> >> Iraq
>> >> being an imminent threat....)
>> >
>> > Bush never said imminent.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Oh, that Iraq was a threat
>> >
>> > Iraq was a threat.  With or without WMD on the ground and it needed to
> be
>> > taken out as part of the GWOT.
>> >
>> >>, or that their intelligence was wrong about it
>> >
>> > Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein
>> > to
>> > have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>> >
>> >> and we shouldn't have invaded.
>> >
>> > We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5