From: "Robert Comer" 

> Bush never said imminent.

So, it was implied.

> Iraq was a threat.  With or without WMD on the ground and it needed to be
> taken out as part of the GWOT.

Now they are, but they weren't before we invaded and there's no way you can
convince me of otherwise, he had *no* means to be a threat.  They weren't
even connected with terrorism before that...

> Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein to
> have WMD and to aid terrorists.

Desire means squat, ability is the only thing that counts.

> We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.

No.

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:437cde0a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:437cda68{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > When you or the democrats get some then, let me know.
>>
>> Plenty has been said, I don't need to reiterate it.  (Something about
>> Iraq
>> being an imminent threat....)
>
> Bush never said imminent.
>
>>
>> Oh, that Iraq was a threat
>
> Iraq was a threat.  With or without WMD on the ground and it needed to be
> taken out as part of the GWOT.
>
>>, or that their intelligence was wrong about it
>
> Intelligence may have been wrong about WMD, not the desire of Hussein to
> have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>
>> and we shouldn't have invaded.
>
> We should have taken him out even knowing all we know today.
>
> Gary
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5