From: "Gary Britt" 

If they can mate and produce fertile offspring, then they are the same
species.  If not.  They aren't.  Simple isn't it.

Gary

"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.1de43cf14c9fd91098972d{at}news.barkto.com...
> In article , email{at}from_Gary_Britt.org says...
> > Doesn't this really rely on first *changing* the definition of what a
> > species is, and then going aha, if we change the definition then we can
cook
> > the books to prove an observation of trans-species evolution.
>
> The definition of what a species is constantly changing, because there
> isn't a simple way of assigning specifics in all cases.
>
> We used to be "Homo Sapien". Now, we are "Homo Sapien
Sapien".
>
> Is a beagle the same species as a corgi? Why or why not?
> Is a lion the same species as a tiger? Why or why not?
>
> What is the key difference between the poppies papaver orientale,
> papaver paucifoliatum, and papaver bracteatum?
>
> 
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5