Hello Tommi,

On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:28:52 +0200, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:
 TK> Nicholas Boel : Paul Quinn

 NB>> Yep, I've noticed this now. Although I'm not actually making any use
 NB>> of the contents of echomail.jam currently, since I'm basically only
 NB>> searching for it, and if it exists, running the tosser and scanning
 NB>> through every area rather than only the specific ones contained in
 NB>> the file. :(

 TK> Yep. Running "hpt scan -w pack -w" is pretty fast operation to run when
 TK> echomail.jam appears. No need for anything fancier. ;)

Why do you run it with the -w option (without highwaters)? Curious minds would
like to know. :)

Regards,
Nick

--- slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)