From: "Robert Comer" 

> The evaluations of Iraq's WMD and dangerous did not hang upon on turn in
> any
> way upon the info of just that one man.

I was just talking about the terrorist connection in that post.

>All intelligence services of the
> western world

You're wrong about that, not all of them.

>as did the Clinton
> administration and all the democraps previously.

Again, I'll say "so", I don't care about what Clinton or the
democrats thought.

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:437de3ef$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> The evaluations of Iraq's WMD and dangerous did not hang upon on turn in
> any
> way upon the info of just that one man.  All intelligence services of the
> western world reached the same conclusions, as did the Clinton
> administration and all the democraps previously.
>
> Gary
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:437de19e{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > There is NO EVIDENCE that Bush suspected the intel was wrong.
>>
>> Except that he was told by the DIA that the evidence was shaky...  (Ibn
>> al-Shaykh -- just the main informant for any terrorist activity.)
>>
>> -
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:437d03fb{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > There is NO EVIDENCE that Bush suspected the intel was wrong.  NONE.
>> > Bush
>> > asked Tenet "Is this all you got?  This is pretty
thin?"  Tenet, the
> head
>> > of
>> > the CIA, the number one official in charge of briefing the President,
> the
>> > person whose job it was to assimilate all that everyone at CIA under
>> > him
>> > thought and to give the President his very best advice, the single
> person
>> > charged with telling the President what the consensus at the CIA was,
>> > stated
>> > to the President "WMD in Iraq is a SLAM DUNK".
>> >
>> > Bush had absolutely NO REASON to question the intel.  Neither did the
>> > Democraps who saw it all themselves and made even STRONGER statements
> than
>> > Bush about IRAQ, WMD, and necessity to take him out.
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>> > news:437cefba{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> Other stories about just how shaky the evidence was before the war.
>> >>
>> >> >Democrats said the same things
>> >> > at the same times as well.
>> >>
>> >> So?  A lie is a lie if you know it's untrue, or even
suspect that you
>> > might
>> >> be wrong and still state it as fact.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Bob Comer
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>> >> news:437cec2d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> > What's the proof that Bush knew the statements were
untrue at the
> time
>> > he
>> >> > spoke them?  Without that they aren't lies. 
Democrats said the same
>> >> > things
>> >> > at the same times as well.
>> >> >
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
>> >> > news:437ce6c0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> > Sheesh, this is all just the same old, same
old, you'll never
> change
>> >> > your
>> >> >> > mind, nor will I.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Without evidence, there's no way to change my mind.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Bush did NOT lie. 
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry, he most certainly did.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Saddam Hussein is no longer a threat to
the United States because
> we
>> >> >> removed him, but he was a threat...He was a
threat. He's not a
> threat
>> >> > now."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 7/2/03
>> >> >> "We gave our word that the threat from Iraq
would be ended."
>> >> >> . President Bush 4/24/03
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "We ended the threat from Saddam Hussein's
weapons of mass
>> > destruction."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 7/17/03
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "The dictator of Iraq and his weapons of
mass destruction are a
> threat
>> > to
>> >> >> the security of free nations."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 3/16/03
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "The Iraqi regime is a threat to any
American. ... Iraq is a
>> >> >> threat,
> a
>> >> > real
>> >> >> threat."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 1/3/03
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Saddam Hussein is a threat to America."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 11/3/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "There is real threat, in my judgment, a
real and dangerous threat
> to
>> >> >> American in Iraq in the form of Saddam Hussein."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 10/28/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "There are many dangers in the world, the
threat from Iraq stands
>> >> >> alone
>> >> >> because it gathers the most serious dangers of
our age in one
>> >> >> place.
>> > Iraq
>> >> >> could decide on any given day to provide a
biological or chemical
>> > weapon
>> >> > to
>> >> >> a terrorist group or individual terrorists."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 10/7/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique
urgency."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 10/2/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "There's a grave threat in Iraq. There just is."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 10/2/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "This man poses a much graver threat than
anybody could have
> possibly
>> >> >> imagined."
>> >> >> . President Bush, 9/26/02
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Bob Comer
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Mark" 
wrote in message
>> > news:437ce305{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> > Sheesh, this is all just the same old, same
old, you'll never
> change
>> >> > your
>> >> >> > mind, nor will I. *What's* new is the Dems
throwing out a bunch
>> >> >> > of
>> >> >> > baseless accusations that BushLied(tm).
Bush did NOT lie.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > So
>> >> >> > they, although being effective in hurting
Bush's poll ratings in
> the
>> >> > short
>> >> >> > term, they're are actually coming off like
the buffoons they are
>> >> >> > with
>> >> >> > their own lie in this regard for the long
term  it's
>> >> >> > harmful to our country and our troops and
I'm damn sick of
> listening
>> > to
>> >> >> > the little weasels>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in
>> >> >> > message
>> >> >> > news:437ce159{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >>> Bush never said imminent.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So, it was implied.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Iraq was a threat.  With or without
WMD on the ground and it
>> >> >> >>> needed
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>> be
>> >> >> >>> taken out as part of the GWOT.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Now they are, but they weren't before
we invaded and there's no
> way
>> >> >> >> you
>> >> >> >> can convince me of otherwise, he had
*no* means to be a threat.
>> > They
>> >> >> >> weren't even connected with terrorism
before that...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> Intelligence may have been wrong
about WMD, not the desire of
>> > Hussein
>> >> > to
>> >> >> >>> have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Desire means squat, ability is the only
thing that counts.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> We should have taken him out even
knowing all we know today.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> No.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Bob Comer
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:437cde0a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> "Robert Comer"
 wrote in
> message
>> >> >> >>> news:437cda68{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >> >> >>>> > When you or the democrats
get some then, let me know.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Plenty has been said, I don't
need to reiterate it.
>> >> >> >>>> (Something
>> >> >> >>>> about
>> >> >> >>>> Iraq
>> >> >> >>>> being an imminent threat....)
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Bush never said imminent.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Oh, that Iraq was a threat
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Iraq was a threat.  With or without
WMD on the ground and it
>> >> >> >>> needed
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>> be
>> >> >> >>> taken out as part of the GWOT.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>, or that their intelligence was
wrong about it
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Intelligence may have been wrong
about WMD, not the desire of
>> > Hussein
>> >> > to
>> >> >> >>> have WMD and to aid terrorists.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> and we shouldn't have invaded.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> We should have taken him out even
knowing all we know today.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Gary
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5