Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mike gray 
Reply-To: scrubadub@att.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.cancer.support, alt.support.diabetes, fidonet.diabetes,
 misc.health.diabetes, talk.politics.medicine
Subject: Re: Single Payer Universal Health Care
References: 
  
 
 
 
 
 
In-Reply-To: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Message-ID: 
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:21:14 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.78.10.65
 26 May 2004 14:21:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:21:14 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.cancer.support:835
 alt.support.diabetes:314576 fidonet.diabetes:370 misc.health.diabetes:290855
 talk.politics.medicine:99349

George Conklin wrote:

>> However, Federal accounting and private sector accounting are
>> significantly different. But one does not have to be a CPA to analyze
>> the data and see that gov't programs spend as much on administration as
>> private sector companies do.
> 
>     Here you go again, claiming falsely that no one knows how to compute
> costs but YOU.  Shame.

I see that English is not yer first language. When I say that "one does 
not have to be a CPA to analyze the data", that means that anyone with 
any understanding of charts of accounts can determine for himself what 
the costs are.

Even you.

And if you bother to do so, you will find that private sector 
administration costs are not seven times public sector administration 
costs, as was stated.