From: "Robert Comer" 

> What a Twilight Zone. The BushLied(tm) theme is no more true today than it
> was when the Dems first started floating it. It's been disproven early and
> often:

Sorry, that wasn't disporven yet -- why do you think it's still an issue,
and with more than just democrats?


--
Bob Comer


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:437cbc46{at}w3.nls.net...
> What a Twilight Zone. The BushLied(tm) theme is no more true today than it
> was when the Dems first started floating it. It's been disproven early and
> often:
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/11/20051113.html
> "Setting the Record Straight: The Washington Post On Pre-War
Intelligence"
>
> It's not Bush that's lying, indeed at most times I'd find this Blankley
> description over the top, but now I'm not so sure:
>
> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-11_16_05_TB.html
> "Now the Watergate babies have grown old -- and age has not improved them.
> They plan to finish their careers as they started them -- in defeatism,
> betrayal and national dishonor. Oh, that America might see the last of
> these fish-eyed sacks of loathsome bile and infamy: Unwholesome in their
> birth; repugnant and stench-forming in their decline."
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:437cafcd{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> What charges?
>>
>> Charges the democrats are making about Bush leading us into war under
>> false pretenses.
>>
>>>I've yet to see anyone post a quote from Bush and then show
>>> it was untrue and then show he knew it was untrue at the time it was
>>> said.
>>
>> I'm asking for the other side of the argument now -- they the republicans
>> should put up a defense of their actions rather than just attacking the
>> democrats.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:437cad37{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> What charges?  I've yet to see anyone post a quote from Bush and then
>>> show
>>> it was untrue and then show he knew it was untrue at the time it was
>>> said.
>>>
>>> Without the above charges of LIES are just LIES about alleged lies.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> "Robert Comer"  wrote
in message
>>> news:437c6a57{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> But they did it too just doesn't cut it.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, it would be far more effective to answer why the charges are
>>>> false
>>>> if he could, rather than attacking the opposition.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Comer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>>>> news:437c16a4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> > CHENEY FIGHTS BACK
>>>> > Wed Nov 16 2005 18:56:46 ET
>>>> >
>>>> > Excerpts As Prepared For Delivery Tonight by Vice
President Cheney
>>>> >
>>>> > THE VICE PRESIDENT: "As most of you know, I have
spent a lot of years
>>>> > in
>>>> > public service, and first came to work in Washington,
D.C. back in
>>>> > the
>>>> > late
>>>> > 1960s. I know what it's like to operate in a highly
charged political
>>>> > environment, in which the players on all sides of an issue feel
>>>> > passionately
>>>> > and speak forcefully.
>>>> >
>>>> > In such an environment people sometimes lose their
cool, and yet in
>>>> > Washington you can ordinarily rely on some basic measure of
>>>> > truthfulness
>>>> > and
>>>> > good faith in the conduct of political debate. But in the last
>>>> > several
>>>> > weeks
>>>> > we have seen a wild departure from that tradition.
>>>> >
>>>> > And the suggestion that's been made by some U. S.
senators that the
>>>> > President of the United States or any member of this
Administration
>>>> > purposely misled the American people on pre-war
intelligence is one
>>>> > of
>>> the
>>>> > most dishonest and reprehensible charges ever aired
in this city...
>>>> >
>>>> > Some of the most irresponsible comments have, of
course, come from
>>>> > politicians who actually voted in favor of
authorizing force against
>>>> > Saddam
>>>> > Hussein. These are elected officials who had access to the
>>>> > intelligence,
>>>> > and
>>>> > were free to draw their own conclusions.
>>>> >
>>>> > They arrived at the same judgment about Iraq's capabilities and
>>> intentions
>>>> > that was made by this Administration and by the previous
>>>> > Administration.
>>>> > There was broad-based, bipartisan agreement that
Saddam Hussein was a
>>>> > threat . that he had violated U.N. Security Council
Resolutions . and
>>>> > that,
>>>> > in a post-9/11 world, we couldn't afford to take the word of a
>>>> > dictator
>>>> > who
>>>> > had a history of WMD programs, who had excluded
weapons inspectors,
>>>> > who
>>>> > had
>>>> > defied the demands of the international community, who had been
>>> designated
>>>> > an official state sponsor of terror, and who had committed mass
>>>> > murder.
>>>> >
>>>> > Those are facts.
>>>> >
>>>> > What we're hearing now is some politicians
contradicting their own
>>>> > statements and making a play for political advantage
in the middle of
>>>> > a
>>>> > war.
>>>> > The saddest part is that our people in uniform have
been subjected to
>>>> > these
>>>> > cynical and pernicious falsehoods day in and day out. American
>>>> > soldiers
>>>> > and
>>>> > Marines are out there every day in dangerous
conditions and desert
>>>> > temperatures - conducting raids, training Iraqi
forces, countering
>>>> > attacks,
>>>> > seizing weapons, and capturing killers - and back home a few
>>> opportunists
>>>> > are suggesting they were sent into battle for a lie.
>>>> >
>>>> > The President and I cannot prevent certain
politicians from losing
>>>> > their
>>>> > memory, or their backbone - but we're not going to
sit by and let
>>>> > them
>>>> > rewrite history.
>>>> >
>>>> > We're going to continue throwing their own words back
at them. And
>>>> > far
>>>> > more
>>>> > important, we're going to continue sending a
consistent message to
>>>> > the
>>> men
>>>> > and women who are fighting the war on terror in Iraq,
Afghanistan,
>>>> > and
>>>> > many
>>>> > other fronts.
>>>> >
>>>> > We can never say enough how much we appreciate them,
and how proud
>>>> > they
>>>> > make
>>>> > us. They and their families can be certain: That this
cause is right
>>>> > .
>>> and
>>>> > the performance of our military has been brave and
honorable . and
>>>> > this
>>>> > nation will stand behind our fighting forces with
pride and without
>>>> > wavering
>>>> > until the day of victory.
>>>> >
>>>> > Developing...
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5