MSGID: 2:20/228 01528a53
In a message dated 01-02-15, Ed Vance said to Holger Granholm:

 HG> In a message dated 12-20-14, Ed Vance said to Holger Granholm:

GM Ed,

Please note the date above!!!  Again it took you two weeks to reply to
a message!

 EV> The Time this one is being written is 12:12 A.M. EST on 12-20-2014 .

 HG> The time stamp of this message as shown in the header is
 HG> 12-20-14 00:13. That means probably that the shown date/time
 HG> may be in UTC (GMT) that is often the time translated to by the
 HG> receiving host.

EV> No it isn't UTC, the 00:13 You saw in the message header is the
EV> shorter way of writing 12:13 A.M. EST.

Why don't you use UTC? Since I started using ham radio 1951 I have used
UTC (GMT was it named then).

When digital arm watches became available I am using one set to
24h display. All my clocks, except a couple of oldies are running
24h digital.

No more AM or PM here.

Please note that this reply is written the same morning that your mail
arrived here in my incoming mail.

Happy New Year,

73 de Holger

___
 * MR/2 2.30 * Without Time, everything would happen at once.


--- PCBoard (R) v15.22 (OS/2) 2