From: John Beckett 

"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news::
> And it sounds like you want anti-religion to make a comeback in the US.

I'm afraid you're confusing me with someone else. All I have done is
express irritation at the attempts here to portray ID as somehow the same
kind of concept as evolution. In fact, ID is meaningless waffle designed to
make people who haven't thought about the issues believe that there is
scientific proof for various peculiar belief systems.

> Actually the problem is you are not reading our arguments like we meant
> them, we are *not* arguing against evolution, we're just pointing out that
> it doesn't cover it all and if you believe in evolution, there are some
> things you have to take on faith -- just like someone who believes in God.

There's quite a lot of words flowing here, and I don't blame you for not
carefully studying everything I write. However, I think you are assuming
arguments that in fact I have not proposed.

If you're asking, of course I realise that science doesn't explain
everything. I am the one who loudly proclaimed that evolution has nothing
to say about how the first life began - evolution just describes how some
life gets more complex.

Also, your use of "we" is not really reasonable. What YOU say,
and what GaryB says, are very different.

John

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5