From: "Robert Comer" 

42%

--
Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:437f7184$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> What poll at Rasmussen says this?
>
> Gary
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:437f6bb3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> >Mark and I are the mainstream of America.
>>
>> Not any more, even by your own preferred polling site.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:437f5aa5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> The people here are VERY skewed in their political opinions.  Mark and I
> are
>> the mainstream of America.  They had the most accurate polling for the
> 2004
>> election compared to all other polling companies.  They are an
>> independent
>> polling firm, they neither poll for democrats or republicans.
>>
>>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/State%20by%20state%20comparisons%202004.htm
>>
>> Rasmussen Reports was the nation's most accurate polling firm during the
>> Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's
> vote
>> total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome.
>> During Election 2004, RasmussenReports.com was also the top-ranked public
>> opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our
>> nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined.
>>
>> Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent
>> pollster for more than a decade.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:437e9d49$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > 43% seems very high compared to our reality check. What did they do,
> take
>> > a
>> > poll of oil and drug company executives?
>> >
>> > Geo.
>> >
>> > "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>> > news:437de4a9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > > I was saying that their was one specific CBS poll that
had obviously
>> > > doctored the numbers through fiddling with the percent
of republican
>> > > respondents.  Not quite what you said.  The best most consistently
> done
>> > poll
>> > > on presidential popularity is Rasmussen's where the
President is at
> 43%
>> > and
>> > > has been for about a month.
>> > >
>> > > Gary
>> > >
>> > > "Geo"  wrote in message
>> > > news:437db9e6$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > > > The reality check was for my benefit. You seemed to
be claiming
>> > > > that
>> > > bush's
>> > > > approval numbers were actually much higher than the
stats being
> banded
>> > > > about, my experience suggested otherwise and I'm
more comfortable
> with
>> > > that
>> > > > now that I've done this simple reality check here.
>> > > >
>> > > > Well that and it's fun. 
>> > > >
>> > > > Geo.
>> > > >
>> > > > "Gary Britt"
 wrote in message
>> > > > news:4378991c{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > > > > OK, what was the reality check point you were
trying to make, and
>> > > > > did
>> > > that
>> > > > > point say anything about the direction people
thought the country
>> > should
>> > > > be
>> > > > > headed?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Gary
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5